start

Create or repair a project's macstack/ folder and macstack.json — from nothing (a six-question interview), from an existing macstack.json, from an existing codebase, or by migrating an older layout Ar

SKILL.md

GitHub

One entry point for everything that brings a project into the standard. Work out which case it is, say which and why, and wait for confirmation before writing anything. Guessing is expensive here: three of these modes move or overwrite files.

Read macstack-dev:setup first — it resolves paths, checks the tooling and tells you what already exists.

Three ways a project starts. They differ only in where the facts come from:

You have Facts come from Mode
Nothing the owner — six questions in result-first order design — spec-authoring B0, then B1–B5
A macstack.json the spec derive — documents, write the six documents from it
A codebase the code audit — code-audit enumerates, then spec-authoring A1–A3

Never mix them. A spec half-derived from a business request and half-guessed from a half-read codebase is a spec nobody can defend a single line of.

Three ways a project is already partly here. The folder exists and something is off:

What you find Mode
macstack.json at the repo root, or a flat/docs/-era layout, or v1 table-shaped documents migrate — documents, migration mode
A valid spec, an incomplete macstack/ repair — documents, create only what is missing
A valid spec and folder, no project files scaffold — scaffold-project
A valid spec and folder, and code that has moved on not this command — /macstack-dev:check --new

Then, in order and without skipping:

  1. code-audit — in audit mode only: enumerate what the code contains before writing a line of spec. Reading a codebase into a spec by browsing it is how a subsystem goes unmentioned — the enumerator lists every candidate the declared stack's conventions produce, and says out loud when a convention matched nothing.
  2. spec-authoring — produce or complete macstack.json. In design mode start at B0, the interview: six questions asked through AskUserQuestion, in result-first order, recommendation first. The order is the method — the chain reads Goal ← Result ← Process ← Task ← Workflow ← Software, so software is decided last or it is decided for the wrong reason. For a hard case, delegate to the macstack-architect agent.
  3. documents — create or repair macstack/, seeding the authored client documents once and rendering the generated ones. Read documents/references/format-rules.md before writing any document.
  4. infisical-env — wire the environment if the spec declares accesses.
  5. best-practices — install the project rules and slash-command skills.
  6. scaffold-project — only in scaffold mode, and only in the mandatory source order: prototype → stack plugins → dev plugins → generation. That order is the product; every violation in testing produced files that contradicted the architecture.
  7. lint — a spec that fails lint is not scaffolded from.

Finally write the ## Stack Specification block into both CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md, pointing at macstack/macstack.json and naming the six client documents. Both, not one: the documents are meant to be read by whichever coding agent the team runs, and a spec only Claude Code can find is a spec half the team cannot use.

Report what was created, what was left alone, and the single next command.