think

Strategic analysis, adversarial validation, executive council debate, and discovery mode for complex decisions

SKILL.md

GitHub

Think

Use Think for high-stakes reasoning. Use workspace context, but do not flood the main session. Subagents may explore alternatives or objections and must return bounded summaries.

Modes

Mode Use when
Strategic analysis The user asks for analysis, tradeoffs, or recommendation
Validation The user asks what could go wrong or to stress-test
Executive council The user wants multi-perspective debate
Discovery The problem is ambiguous or needs non-obvious angles
Deep analysis The user explicitly needs a full chain of analysis

If discovery requires a dedicated bisociation engine, route to skills/ideate/.

Rules

  • State the framework and why it fits.
  • Separate evidence, assumptions, risks, and recommendation.
  • Use internal context when relevant, but cite uncertainty.
  • Do not persist analysis unless the user asks or the workflow requires a saved artifact.

References

  • manifesto.md
  • references/analyze.md
  • references/council.md
  • references/legacy-full-protocol.md