mcode-delegate
Delegate a coding task to the MiniMax Code CLI (`mcode`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to MiniMax
SKILL.mdskills/mcode-delegate/SKILL.md
GitHubMiniMax Code Delegate
You are the orchestrator. This skill lets you hand a bounded coding task to a separate
implementer — the MiniMax Code CLI (mcode) — then review what it produced and land it yourself.
You write the brief and own the judgment; MiniMax Code does the typing in your working tree; you
verify and commit.
Nothing here is specific to one orchestrating agent. The loop needs only the ability to run a shell command and read a file, so it works the same whether you are Claude Code, OpenCode with a selected model, or any comparable agent. (It is designed for and run on Claude Code; treat other orchestrators as designed-for, not yet proven.)
When NOT to use this
- The task is small enough to just do inline — delegation overhead is not worth it.
mcodeis not installed or not signed in (runmcode login, ormcode login --region global).- You want to write the code yourself, or you only need a review of local changes (
mcode exec reviewdoes that directly). - You need writes outside the target tree to be impossible, not just unlikely. MiniMax Code has no
sandbox; use an OS-enforced one such as
codex-delegate, or run this inside a container.
Read this before the first dispatch: the autonomy model
mcode exec takes a permission policy — smart, full, or off — and has no sandbox and no
read-only or plan setting for a headless run (ask needs the TUI or ACP).
smart(the relay's default; TUI Auto): already approves file writes and deletions headlessly. A live probe asked for anrmand got it with no prompt. Sosmartis not a guardrail: the brief and a clean working tree are the real scope.full(TUI Full access): skips normal confirmation entirely. The relay passes it only on an explicit--permission full.off: refused by the relay; MiniMax Code does not document what it disables.
--read-only is advisory: the relay appends a system prompt forbidding edits, keeps smart, and
then runs a Git-visible change tripwire (readOnlyViolation). A change is detected after the fact,
not prevented, and ignored or outside-repository paths are not covered.
Prerequisites (check once)
mcode --versionsucceeds and you are signed in (mcode→/statusin the TUI). If not, install MiniMax Code and runmcode login.- Confirm
mcodeis on PATH in the shell the relay runs from. The official installer puts it in~/.minimax-code/bin, which only your shell profile adds to PATH; an orchestrator's non-login shell may not see it. Pass--mcode-path <file>or setMCODE_CLIwhencommand -v mcodecomes back empty. The relay records the version it ran inresult.json. - You are in (or will point
--cdat) the target git repository, and its tree is clean before you dispatch — a run with no sandbox is much easier to review against a clean baseline.
The loop
Run these five steps per task. Steps 1, 4, and 5 are your judgment; 2 and 3 are mechanical.
1. Write the brief
MiniMax Code sees only the text you send — no repo memory, no chat history, no shared context
(beyond the repo's own AGENTS.md, which it reads). Everything the task needs goes in the brief: the
goal, the current state, what to change, what to leave untouched, the project's actual gate
commands (discover them from the repo's AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md/Makefile — do not assume), and a report
contract. Tell it that it will not commit (you will). Keep one task per brief. Full guidance and a
template: references/writing-the-brief.md.
2. Dispatch
Send the brief to MiniMax Code with the bundled helper. It wraps mcode exec, captures the run, and
writes a structured result.json — so your only job is "run a command, read a file." (<skill-dir>
below is this skill's installed directory — the folder containing this SKILL.md, i.e. the directory
you loaded the skill from. Claude Code prints it as "Base directory for this skill" when the skill
loads; on other orchestrators use that same directory — if unsure where it landed, run
find ~ -name relay.mjs -path '*mcode-delegate*' and substitute the directory above it.)
node "<skill-dir>/scripts/relay.mjs" --brief brief.txt --cd /path/to/repo
# read-only (review/diagnosis; advisory): add --read-only
# continue the exact session: add --session <sessionId> (from result.json; send only the delta brief)
# model / effort for this run: add --model minimax/<model> --effort high
# hard time limit (watchdog): add --timeout 2h (default: off; implementation runs routinely need 1-2h)
# see all options: node .../relay.mjs --help
The helper defaults to a write-capable (--permission smart) run, which intentionally edits the target
repository. Its temp directory keeps only relay artifacts out of that repository. The relay never
commits — see step 5. Mechanics, flags, and the result.json shape:
references/dispatch-and-poll.md.
3. Wait for completion
The helper blocks until MiniMax Code finishes, so back it with whatever your orchestrator offers and resume when it returns:
- Claude Code: run the Bash call with
run_in_background: true; you are notified on completion. - Plain shell / other agents: run it in the foreground for short tasks, or background it and poll
the result file —
… &in bash/zsh, or your shell's equivalent. The run is done whenresult.jsonexists with astatus. (A pre-run usage error — bad args or an empty brief — instead exits with code 2 and a stderr message and writes no result file, so check the exit code too. A missingmcodebinary exits 127 but does write aresult.jsonwith statusmcode_unavailable.)
A run is finished when result.json is written and the process has exited — read the working tree,
not a status line. The implementer's full report is the finalMessage field in result.json (also
printed in full on stdout between the report markers).
4. Review — do not trust the self-report
result.json includes MiniMax Code's own summary and gate claims. Re-verify, don't accept:
- Re-run the project's gates yourself (the test/lint/build commands from step 1). Never take "gates passed" on faith.
- Read the diff against the brief: did it do what was asked, nothing more (scope creep) and
nothing less?
touchedFilesin the result is your starting point — and because there was no sandbox, check for edits and deletions outside the paths the brief named, not just inside them. - Run the relevant guard skills on the diff if you have them installed (clean-code-guard,
test-guard, etc. from
guard-skills) — this skill produces the work; those skills judge it. - For schema/migration changes, round-trip them; for removals, grep for dangling references.
Full checklist: references/review-and-land.md.
5. Land it
The relay never commits, but nothing stops MiniMax Code from writing .git. The brief forbids
implementer commits, and the reviewer compares HEAD with the recorded pre-dispatch baseline before
landing anything. The orchestrator commits. Only after the gates pass and the diff holds:
- Commit the verified work yourself, with a clear message.
- If it needs changes, send a delta brief with
--session <sessionId>from the priorresult.json, and review again.
Read-only second opinions
The relay doubles as a way to get an adversarial second opinion: dispatch --read-only with a brief
that lists the agreed points, then each contested point with both positions, and ask MiniMax Code to
defend or concede each — deliverable in its final message, touching no files. Because that read-only
state is only a prompt, read the verdict every time: readOnlyViolation: false means the Git-visible
detector saw no change (ignored or outside-repository paths are not covered); true means it saw
one; null means git could not tell. Dispatch second opinions on a clean tree you can afford to
restore.
Authorization model
Delegation is something the human opts into. Once they have ("run this queue", "proceed"), committing verified, gate-passing work is the agreed contract — that is the whole point. Two limits on that mandate: surface, don't absorb (report MiniMax Code's design decisions, defensible-but-unasked turns, and non-blocking nitpicks rather than silently keeping them) and stop for scope changes (if correct completion needs going beyond the brief, ask — don't expand the mandate yourself). The full treatment is in references/review-and-land.md.
References
- references/writing-the-brief.md — how to write a brief MiniMax Code can execute blind: structure, XML blocks, the report contract, embedding the real gate commands.
- references/dispatch-and-poll.md —
relay.mjsflags, theresult.jsoncontract, backgrounding per orchestrator, and recovery when a run misbehaves. - references/review-and-land.md — the review checklist, the commit boundary, and the exact-session rework cycle.
- references/multi-task-queues.md — running a sequential queue: carrying constraints forward, progress tracking, and the end-of-run coherence check.