Suggest PR Title and Description

Steps

1. Identify the current branch and refresh the base by running:

   git fetch origin
   git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
   

   The base is origin/main (substitute your project's trunk branch if different). Use the remote base so the diff isn't computed against a stale local main.

2. Read all commits on this branch that diverge from the base:

   git log --oneline origin/main..HEAD
   

3. Read the full diff summary against the base:

   git diff origin/main...HEAD --stat
   

   And the full diff for more detail:

   git diff origin/main...HEAD
   

4. Suggest a PR title and description following the format below.

Output format

Output everything as rendered markdown directly in the conversation — do not create any files. Use real markdown syntax: ## for section headers, backticks around all file names, function names, and technical identifiers.

**Title:** <type(scope): concise description all lowercase>

## Description
<two or three sentences in natural language explaining the overall goal of this PR and why the changes were made>

## Changelist
- <bullet: what changed and why, in natural language>
- <bullet: what changed and why, in natural language>
- <add more as needed>

Guidelines

• Title: conventional commit format, all lowercase, no period, under 70 characters. Use the appropriate prefix (feat, fix, refactor, chore, etc.) and include a scope in parentheses matching the area affected (e.g. feat(auth):, fix(api):, refactor(db):). Example: feat(auth): store session tokens in the database.
• Description: high-level context for a reviewer — what problem this solves and why now. Natural language, full sentences.
• Changelist: one bullet per logical change. Keep each bullet short and punchy — one clause, no padding words like "in order to" or "so that". Use backticks around file names and technical identifiers. Do not explain the motivation or downstream effects; just state what changed.
• Honor your project's PR conventions — e.g. whether to include co-author lines. Keep implementation details that belong in inline comments out of the description.