plan-mode-deep-research
Investigate a consequential or contested question across multiple primary sources. Use when a quick lookup is insufficient because evidence conflicts, versions differ, or the decision depends on sever
SKILL.mdskills/plan-mode/deep-research/SKILL.md
GitHubDeep Research
Build a defensible answer, including the evidence that challenges it.
- Break the decision into questions and record what would confirm or overturn each likely answer. Set the relevant time window, versions, platforms, and source boundaries before searching.
- Gather primary evidence for every question. Follow documentation into release notes, code, issue discussions, or original data when needed. Record source date and applicability; do not count repeated summaries of one source as independent support.
- Seek counterexamples and competing explanations. Reconcile conflicts using version, environment, methodology, and source authority. If reconciliation fails, preserve the disagreement and state what observation would settle it.
- Present the conclusion, an evidence table or concise claim-to-source map, alternatives considered, confidence, and unresolved gaps. Finish only when each decision-critical claim is supported, refuted, or clearly unresolved.
Keep this investigation read-only unless the user separately authorizes changes. If one official page answers the question, use plan-mode-research or plan-mode-read-docs instead.
Record this output in docs/plans/ per the doc system, delegating the write to a subagent.