FedRAMP/StateRAMP Assessment

Assess Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) and StateRAMP readiness for "$ARGUMENTS". Determine impact level, evaluate NIST SP 800-53 control baseline, and assess ATO package readiness.

Prerequisites

Read .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md. If this file does not exist, tell the user:

Phase 0 (Scope) has not been completed for "$ARGUMENTS". Run /compliance:regulatory-landscape $ARGUMENTS first, or use --skip-checks to bypass.

If --skip-checks is present in $ARGUMENTS, skip this check.

Process

1. Read context files:

   • Read plugins/compliance/shared/grc-lifecycle-guide.md for GRC methodology reference
   • Read plugins/compliance/shared/assessment-template.md for output structure
   • Read .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md for scope and control framework context

2. Impact level determination:

   • Assess confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact levels per FIPS 199
   • Determine overall impact level: Low, Moderate, or High
   • Evaluate if FedRAMP Tailored (Li-SaaS) applies for low-impact SaaS
   • Document impact level determination with rationale

3. NIST SP 800-53 control baseline assessment:

   • Access Control (AC) — account management, access enforcement, separation of duties, least privilege, session controls, remote access, MFA
   • Audit and Accountability (AU) — audit events, content, storage, review, analysis, reporting, reduction, generation, protection
   • Security Assessment and Authorization (CA) — security assessment plan, POA&M, continuous monitoring, penetration testing
   • Configuration Management (CM) — baseline configuration, change control, least functionality, software restrictions, configuration settings
   • Contingency Planning (CP) — contingency plan, training, testing, alternate processing/storage, system recovery
   • Identification and Authentication (IA) — user identification, authenticator management, device identification, MFA
   • Incident Response (IR) — incident response plan, training, testing, handling, monitoring, reporting
   • Maintenance (MA) — controlled maintenance, tools, remote maintenance, personnel
   • Media Protection (MP) — media access, marking, storage, transport, sanitization
   • Physical and Environmental Protection (PE) — access authorizations, monitoring, visitor control, emergency procedures
   • Planning (PL) — security plan, system security plan update, rules of behavior
   • Program Management (PM) — information security program plan, senior security officer, risk management strategy
   • Risk Assessment (RA) — risk assessment, vulnerability scanning, risk response
   • System and Communications Protection (SC) — application partitioning, boundary protection, cryptographic protection, network disconnect
   • System and Information Integrity (SI) — flaw remediation, malicious code protection, security alerts, software integrity, information input validation, error handling, memory protection
   • Score each control family: implemented / partially implemented / planned / not implemented

4. 3PAO requirements:

   • Identify qualified Third Party Assessment Organization (3PAO) requirements
   • Assess readiness for initial assessment
   • Evaluate continuous monitoring program for ongoing authorization
   • Review annual assessment requirements

5. ATO package readiness:

   • Assess System Security Plan (SSP) completeness
   • Review Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M)
   • Evaluate Continuous Monitoring (ConMon) program
   • Assess Incident Response Plan
   • Review Security Assessment Report readiness
   • Evaluate supply chain risk management documentation

6. StateRAMP considerations:

   • Identify StateRAMP-specific requirements beyond FedRAMP
   • Assess state-specific data residency requirements
   • Review StateRAMP verification levels (Ready, Authorized, Authorized+)
   • Evaluate reciprocity opportunities between FedRAMP and StateRAMP

7. Write the artifact to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/fedramp.md following the assessment template structure with:

   • Impact Level Determination — FIPS 199 analysis and overall impact level
   • Control Baseline Assessment — scoring per NIST 800-53 control family
   • 3PAO Readiness — assessment organization requirements and readiness
   • ATO Package Status — SSP, POA&M, ConMon, and documentation readiness
   • StateRAMP Considerations — additional requirements and verification level
   • Evidence Inventory — existing evidence and evidence gaps
   • Remediation Priorities — ranked list of gaps to address

Output

The FedRAMP/StateRAMP assessment written to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/fedramp.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:

• Impact level determination (Low/Moderate/High)
• Overall control baseline compliance score
• ATO package readiness percentage
• Top 3 gaps requiring remediation
• Estimated timeline to authorization readiness