policy-brief

Generates structured public policy briefs analyzing legislation across economic, social, legal, and implementation dimensions. Use when drafting legislative impact analyses, policy summaries, regulato

SKILL.md

GitHub

Policy Brief

Produces a balanced, structured policy brief that distills complex legislation into actionable impact analysis for diverse stakeholders.

Prerequisites

  1. Legislation text — full bill text, enrolled version, or enacted law
  2. Legislative history (optional) — committee reports, fiscal notes, floor statements, amendment records
  3. Supplemental materials (optional) — CBO/CRS analyses, agency impact statements, stakeholder comment letters

Quick Start

  1. Gather legislation text and any available history/analysis
  2. Follow the output structure below section by section
  3. Apply guidelines throughout — objectivity, plain language, fact vs. projection
  4. Mark unverified statutory citations with [VERIFY]

Output Structure

1. Executive Summary (2–3 paragraphs)

Cover: policy area, problem addressed, primary mechanism, and net expected impact (one-sentence takeaway).

2. Background & Context

  • Policy problem and triggering events
  • Prior legislative attempts or existing law being modified
  • Political context: sponsors, coalitions, amendment history
  • Comparable policies in other jurisdictions

3. Key Provisions

Provision Description Effective Date Mandatory/Discretionary Sunset?
§ ___ ... ... ... ...

Flag phased implementation and delegated rulemaking authority.

4. Impact Analysis

Analyze across four dimensions:

  • Economic — effects on businesses (by size/sector), government budgets, individuals; include quantitative projections from fiscal notes/CBO scores where available
  • Social — affected populations, equity/distributional effects, public health/education/safety implications
  • Legal & Regulatory — constitutional considerations, federalism implications, relationship to existing framework, new compliance/enforcement mechanisms
  • Implementation — responsible agencies, resource requirements, timeline/phasing, administrative capacity concerns

5. Stakeholder Positions

Stakeholder Position Rationale
... Support/Oppose/Mixed ...

Present viewpoints without advocacy. Note coalition alignments.

6. Risks & Open Questions

  • Unintended consequences and genuine uncertainty
  • Implementation bottlenecks and litigation risk
  • Questions dependent on future rulemaking or appropriations

7. Sources

List key sources consulted (legislation text, committee reports, agency analyses, academic studies).

Pitfalls & Checks

  • Objectivity is paramount — inform, do not persuade; acknowledge all sides of legitimate debate
  • Plain language — define legal/technical terms on first use; use concrete examples for abstract mechanisms
  • Fact vs. projection — label estimates, forecasts, and contested claims explicitly
  • Target length — 3–6 pages; optimize for time-constrained readers
  • Jurisdiction — default to U.S. federal; note state-level interactions where relevant
  • Citations — mark any statutory citation not from provided materials with [VERIFY]
  • Audience — write for policy professionals and informed non-specialists