83,201 skills sorted by stars.
Review and refactor code in your project according to defined instructions
Review and simplify implementation
Check API, library, and framework usage in code against official documentation and installed skill knowledge. Flags depr...
Research modern solutions and approaches for issues or features proposed in a report or plan. Use when user says "review...
Interactive architectural review workflow. Analyzes codebase organization via noun analysis, produces a target blueprint...
Architecture-focused review covering boundaries, performance, scalability, and API contracts. Spawns the senior-review-s...
[Code Quality] Review artifact quality before handoff. Use to verify PBIs, designs, stories meet quality standards.
Review Python backend code for architecture, async performance, and logic.
Discover functions that block the main thread, then micro-audit each for internal optimization opportunities
A skill for reviewing git branches. It helps analyze changes, commit history, and provide feedback to ensure code qualit...
Audit code for logical bugs, race conditions, edge cases, and error handling issues.
Capture and retrieve PR review knowledge in project memory palaces
Code review of current git changes, compare to related plan if exists, identify bad engineering, over-engineering, or su...
[Code Quality] Review all uncommitted changes before commit
End-to-end review pipeline — creates a handoff, generates a review (self-review or paste-ready for another provider), th...
Review uncommitted code changes for bugs, security issues, and style violations.
Systematic code review checklist with severity classification. Activate whenever the user asks for a code review, wants...
Verify code changes comply with CLAUDE.md instructions and project standards.
Review recent conversations to find improvements for CLAUDE.md files.
Audit all CLAUDE.md files for dead references, bloat, and inconsistencies
Analyze code quality based on "Clean Code" principles. Identify naming, function size, duplication, over-engineering, an...
Multi-dimensional code review with structured reports. Analyzes correctness, readability, performance, security, testing...
Perform systematic code review following project standards. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, ch...
Review code for quality, correctness, and fit. Use when the user wants judgment on code that already exists — their own...
Run a comprehensive multi-perspective code review on current changes. Activates the Review Council (security, quality, d...
Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage ga...
Backend code review following best practices. TODO: Implement for backend. Invoked by: "code review", "review PR", "revi...
Provides a structured workflow for planning and executing code reviews like a senior engineer. Use when asked to review...
Perform a comprehensive code review of either the current branch or a specific GitHub pull request.
(ePost) Ultrathink edge cases, then parallel verify with reviewers
Review code changes following HMIS project standards. Use when reviewing a pull request, verifying code changes, or chec...
Perform a senior-engineer code review when the user asks to review code, review a PR, review changes, or check code qual...
Frontend code review following best practices. TODO: Implement for frontend. Invoked by: "code review", "review PR", "re...
Review code quality — separation of concerns, magic numbers, DRY, maintenance issues
Open Review of code quality
Use this skill when you need a final review pass to ensure code changes are as simple and minimal as possible. This agen...
[Review & Quality] ⚡⚡⚡ Scan & analyze the codebase.
Final code/plan review using Codex CLI. Use as the last review step after sonnet.
Final code/plan review using Codex. Use as the last review step after sonnet and opus.
Address PR review comments from reviewers (amazon-q-developer, copilot, humans). Use when the user wants to see and resp...
Audit comments for staleness — stale identifier references, outdated behavioral claims, and unverifiable flags