SOC 2

Apply SOC 2 to identify, assess, and mitigate security risks in systems, processes, and data handling.

SKILL.md

GitHub

SOC 2

Purpose

Use SOC 2 to give customers independent assurance about how a service organisation protects their data and systems. A SOC 2 report is an attestation by a licensed CPA firm, under AICPA standards, on controls relevant to the Trust Services Criteria. It is not a certification and there is no pass mark: the report describes the system, the controls and the auditor's opinion, including any exceptions. It is a common requirement for SaaS vendors selling to businesses, especially in the United States.

Frameworks & Standards

Item Value
Framework ID soc-2
Category Security — Assurance Reporting
Version 2.0.0
Owner American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
Criteria Trust Services Criteria (2017, with revised points of focus 2022)
Related reports SOC 1 (controls relevant to financial reporting) · SOC 3 (general-use summary)

Key Elements

Trust Services Categories

  • Security (the common criteria): required in every SOC 2.
  • Availability.
  • Processing integrity.
  • Confidentiality.
  • Privacy. The organisation chooses which categories beyond security to include.

Report types

  • Type I: whether controls are suitably designed, at a point in time.
  • Type II: whether controls are suitably designed and operated effectively over a period, typically several months to a year.

The common criteria are organised around the COSO internal control principles, plus areas such as logical access, system operations, change management and risk mitigation.

Core Principles

  • Attestation, not certification. The auditor gives an opinion; exceptions are reported.
  • Your controls, your description. The organisation defines its system and controls; the auditor tests them.
  • Operating effectiveness needs evidence over time. Type II tests samples across the period.
  • Scope the system boundary deliberately: services, infrastructure, people, data and subservice organisations.
  • Continuous compliance beats a once-a-year scramble.

Applications & Use Cases

Use Case Application Element
Enterprise sales requirement Obtain a Type II report for the relevant service Type II
First-time readiness Gap assessment, then a Type I Type I
Customer due diligence Share the report under NDA Report
Vendor risk management Review vendors' reports, exceptions and complementary controls Report
Public trust signal Publish a SOC 3 summary SOC 3
Aligning frameworks Map controls shared with ISO 27001 Common criteria

Usage Guidelines

  • Choose the categories customers actually need, starting with security.
  • Run a readiness assessment before the audit period starts.
  • Automate evidence collection for access reviews, change management and monitoring.
  • Define complementary user entity controls that customers are responsible for.
  • Review subservice organisations' reports, such as your cloud provider's.

Prompt Template

You are preparing for a SOC 2 examination (AICPA Trust Services Criteria).

SERVICE and system boundary: [[...]]
CATEGORIES in scope: security (+ availability · processing integrity · confidentiality · privacy)
REPORT TYPE and period:
CONTROLS by common-criteria area: designed? operating? evidence source
SUBSERVICE ORGANISATIONS and complementary user entity controls:
GAPS before the audit period:

Ethical Guidelines

  • Never misrepresent a report's scope, type or exceptions to customers.
  • Do not create evidence after the fact; controls must actually have operated.

Testing Strategy

  • Internal testing of samples before the auditor does.
  • Mock walkthroughs with control owners.

Success Metrics

  • Exceptions in the auditor's report.
  • Evidence collected automatically versus manually.
  • Sales cycles unblocked by the report.

Collaboration Protocol

  • Inbound from: compliance-officer · infrastructure-maintainer
  • Outbound to: security-auditor; legal-compliance-checker for report sharing and NDAs
  • Cross-framework: ISO 27001 for an international certification; NIST CSF for program design; COBIT for governance.

Related Skills

  • composable-skills/frameworks/iso-27001/SKILL.md — international certification
  • composable-skills/frameworks/nist-cybersecurity-framework/SKILL.md — program design
  • composable-skills/frameworks/cobit/SKILL.md — governance
  • composable-skills/frameworks/sox/SKILL.md — financial reporting controls

Reference Materials

  • AICPA. (2017, revised points of focus 2022). Trust Services Criteria for Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy.
  • AICPA. SOC 2 Reporting on an Examination of Controls at a Service Organization Relevant to Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, or Privacy (Guide).
  • COSO. (2013). Internal Control — Integrated Framework.

Copyright (c) 2026 iSystematic Inc. Maxim product. BSL 1.1. Authored 2026-10-15, replacing a generated template stub.