Generate Spike Report

Path Resolution

1. Read workflow.json in the project root
2. If it exists and docsRepo is ".": this IS the docs repo — use local paths
3. If it exists and docsRepo is a repo name: resolve via pwsh .claude/skills/tool-worktree/scripts/resolve-repo.ps1 <docsRepo> to get the docs root path. Templates at <resolved>/templates/, output to <resolved>/spikes/
4. If no workflow.json: templates at templates/, output to docs/spikes/

Instructions

1. Resolve paths (see Path Resolution above)
2. Read the template at <templates>/spike.md
3. Clarify the research question — it should be stated as a clear, answerable question
4. Document findings:
   • If you performed the research: capture what was found, with evidence
   • If the user did the research: interview them and structure the findings
5. Generate the spike report:
   • Question: Clear, specific, answerable
   • Findings: Organized by topic, each with evidence
   • Comparison: Table if comparing options
   • Recommendation: Clear and tied back to the question
6. Save to <output>/[slug].md

Quality Checklist

• Question is specific and answerable (not vague)
• Time-box is stated (spikes are bounded)
• Each finding has evidence (not just assertions)
• Comparison table is included if evaluating options
• Recommendation is clear and justified
• Open questions are listed (what we still don't know)
• Next steps are concrete

Tips

• A spike should answer a question, not build a feature
• Include links to everything consulted (docs, repos, articles)
• If a prototype was built, link to it and describe its limitations
• The recommendation should be actionable: "We should do X because Y"
• If the spike is inconclusive, say so — that's a valid outcome