source-criticism-gate

Use when evaluating the trustworthiness of external websites, research data, or cited literature to audit and select Tier 1/Tier 2 academic sources.

SKILL.md

GitHub

Source Criticism Gate Skill

Purpose

Automatically audit and classify external URLs, datasets, and literature sources into trustworthiness tiers to prevent informal, unverified, or non-peer-reviewed sources from polluting academic manuscripts.

Hierarchy of Evidence Trustworthiness

🟢 Tier 1: Highest Trust (Peer-Reviewed Academic & International Official)

  • Peer-Reviewed Journals & Repositories: OpenAlex, arXiv, Crossref, Semantic Scholar, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, Springer, NBER, RePEc
  • Official International Agencies: World Bank, Asian Development Bank (ADB), UN, IMF, OECD, WHO
  • National Statistical Offices & Central Banks: Japan Statistics Bureau, U.S. Census Bureau, national NSOs, Bank of Japan, Federal Reserve, ECB

🟡 Tier 2: Acceptable (Official Government & Recognized Research Institutes)

  • Government Ministries: Ministries of Education/Finance and their national equivalents
  • Public Research Institutes: Brookings, RAND Corporation, RIETI, national development institutes
  • University Repositories: Institutional .edu, .ac.jp, .ac.uk discussion papers and theses

🔴 Tier 3: Rejected / Prohibited (Untrusted & Informal Sources)

  • Personal Blogs, Social Media, Forums: Note, Qiita, X (Twitter), Reddit
  • Wikipedia / Encyclopedias: Direct citations prohibited (trace back to the primary paper instead)
  • Anonymous Media / Commercial Marketing Sites: Unverified summary articles, affiliate content

Scope Note (Disputes Within Tier 1)

This gate evaluates the trustworthiness of the source type only; it does not assess scholarly disputes, contestation status, or retractions within Tier 1 (peer-reviewed) literature. Those are handled through the following division of labor:

  • Discovering and recording opposing camps: literature-search Step 1.5 (Faction Discovery) and the "Position / Camp" and "Contestation Status" columns of literature-matrix.md
  • Auditing claim tone: the Field Disagreement axis of claim-evidence-gate

Workflow

Step 1: Evaluate Source Trustworthiness

Run the evaluation script on any fetched URL or domain:

python3 scripts/evaluate_source_trust.py https://example-source.org/report.pdf

Step 2: Audit & Filter Actions

  • Tier 1 / Tier 2: Approved. Output data into docs/data/ or docs/literature/ and allow citations in docs/chapters/.
  • Tier 3: Rejected. Strictly prohibit direct citations in manuscript text; mandate re-fetching from a primary academic source.

Outputs

  • docs/design/source-criticism-report.md (Source Criticism Audit Report)