codexkit-policy-document-writer

Author structured policy documents and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) following ISO document control standards. Covers purpose, scope, roles, policy statements, procedures, compliance monitoring

SKILL.md

GitHub

Policy Document Writer

When to Use

  • When creating a new corporate policy or procedure
  • When formalizing informal processes into official SOPs
  • When audit findings require documented policies
  • When regulatory requirements demand written procedures

Procedure

Step 1 — Document Control Header

Field Value
Document ID POL-[Department]-[NNN]
Title [Clear, specific title]
Version 1.0
Effective Date [Date]
Review Date [12 months from effective]
Owner [Role/Name]
Approver [Role/Name]
Classification Internal / Confidential / Public

Step 2 — Purpose & Scope

Purpose: One paragraph explaining:

  • WHY this policy exists
  • WHAT problem it addresses
  • WHAT compliance requirement it satisfies (if any)

Scope:

  • Who this applies to (roles, departments, locations)
  • What it covers (and explicitly what it does NOT cover)
  • When it takes effect

Step 3 — Definitions

Define key terms to avoid ambiguity:

Term Definition
PII Personally Identifiable Information — any data that can identify an individual
Data Controller Entity that determines purposes and means of processing personal data

Step 4 — Roles & Responsibilities

Role Responsibilities
Policy Owner Maintains, reviews, updates the policy
Department Heads Ensures team compliance, reports violations
All Employees Reads, understands, follows the policy
Compliance Team Monitors adherence, conducts audits

Step 5 — Policy Statements

Write clear, enforceable statements:

Good:

All employees must complete security awareness training within 30 days of hire and annually thereafter.

Bad:

Employees should try to complete training when possible.

Rules for policy statements:

  • Use "must" for requirements, "should" for recommendations
  • Be specific about timeframes, quantities, and thresholds
  • Include consequences for non-compliance
  • Reference related policies by ID

Step 6 — Procedures (SOP)

For each procedure, document step-by-step:

Step Action Responsible System Notes
1 Receive request via [channel] [Role] [System] —
2 Verify requester identity [Role] [System] Check against directory
3 Assess request against policy [Role] [Checklist] Use form X-123
4 Approve or deny with reason [Role] [System] Document decision

Include decision trees for complex procedures:

  • If [condition A] → follow path 1
  • If [condition B] → escalate to [role]

Step 7 — Compliance & Monitoring

Check Method Frequency Responsible
Training completion LMS report Monthly HR
Policy acknowledgment e-signature Annual Compliance
Incident review Audit log Quarterly Security

Step 8 — Review Schedule

Trigger Action
Annual review date Full review by policy owner
Regulatory change Impact assessment within 30 days
Significant incident Review and update within 15 days
Organizational change Review scope and applicability

Inputs

Input Required Format
Policy topic Yes What the policy covers
Regulatory requirements Recommended Applicable laws/standards
Existing informal processes Recommended Current practices to formalize
Approval authority Yes Who approves the policy

Output

# POL-IT-003: Acceptable Use Policy

**Version:** 1.0 | **Effective:** 2024-04-01 | **Review:** 2025-04-01
**Owner:** IT Director | **Approver:** CIO

## 1. Purpose
This policy defines acceptable use of company IT resources to protect
organizational assets and ensure compliance with data protection regulations.

## 2. Scope
Applies to all employees, contractors, and third parties who access
[Company] IT systems, networks, or data.

## 3. Definitions
[Key terms table]

## 4. Roles & Responsibilities
[RACI-style table]

## 5. Policy Statements
5.1 All users MUST use unique credentials...
5.2 Personal devices MUST be enrolled in MDM...

## 6. Procedures
[Step-by-step procedures for common scenarios]

## 7. Compliance Monitoring
[Audit schedule and methods]

## 8. Change Log
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|---------|------|--------|---------|
| 1.0 | 2024-04-01 | IT Director | Initial release |

Definition of Done

  • Document control header complete
  • Purpose and scope clearly defined
  • Key terms defined to avoid ambiguity
  • Roles and responsibilities assigned
  • Policy statements use "must" language
  • Procedures are step-by-step with responsible roles
  • Compliance monitoring plan included
  • Review schedule and change log present

Quality Criteria

  • All placeholder sections are filled with domain-specific content
  • Structure follows the relevant industry standard or framework
  • Language matches target audience (technical / executive / legal)
  • Output is ready for review — not a rough draft requiring major rework

Verification (4C)

Check Question
Correctness Does the draft structure follow the stated framework or industry standard?
Completeness Are all required sections present with substantive (not placeholder) content?
Context-fit Does tone, detail level, and terminology match the intended audience?
Consequence If sent to the intended recipient without further editing, what would fail?

Edge Cases

  • No existing template for this type — Use the closest available template and document all customizations made.
  • Stakeholder requirements conflict — Flag conflicts explicitly in the draft. Do not silently choose one requirement over another.
  • Output required in multiple formats — Produce the canonical format first, then derive others. Note any formatting limitations.

Changelog

  • v1.0.0 — Initial release