stakeholder-management

Use when the user asks "who are our customers?" / "how do we tailor for X stakeholder?" / "who should this report go to?", or wants to map / re-map stakeholder needs. Ensures intelligence reaches the

SKILL.md

GitHub

Stakeholder Management

Intelligence that doesn't reach the right person in the right format might as well not exist. This skill ensures every product is tailored to its audience.

Stakeholder Identification

Common CTI Stakeholders

Stakeholder Needs Format Cadence
CISO Strategic risk, business impact, investment justification Executive summary, risk scores, trend analysis Monthly + ad-hoc
SOC Manager Operational context, detection priorities, hunt leads Operational briefs, IOC packages, hunt playbooks Weekly + real-time
SOC Analysts Tactical indicators, detection rules, response guidance IOCs, SIGMA/YARA rules, enriched alerts Daily + real-time
IR Team Campaign context, TTP detail, forensic indicators Detailed campaign reports, investigation leads Per-incident
Security Architecture Threat landscape, emerging attack vectors, control gaps Threat assessments, ATT&CK mapping, control recommendations Quarterly
Risk Management Threat trends, probability assessments, sector comparisons Risk assessments, likelihood language, quantified impact Quarterly
Board / Executive High-level risk posture, material incidents, peer benchmarks 1-page dashboard, non-technical language, visual aids Quarterly + material events
Legal / Compliance Regulatory threat intelligence, breach notification triggers Compliance-focused briefs, attribution (when needed) Ad-hoc
IT Operations Vulnerability intelligence, patch priorities, asset exposure Vulnerability assessments, prioritised patch lists Weekly

Stakeholder Register Template

Maintain in data/pirs/stakeholder-register.md:

| Stakeholder | Role | PIRs | Products | Format Preference | Cadence | Feedback Method |
|-------------|------|------|----------|-------------------|---------|-----------------|
| [Name/Title] | [Role] | PIR-001, PIR-003 | Threat assessments, weekly brief | Executive summary, max 1 page | Monthly | Email response |

Tailoring Intelligence Products

For Executives (CISO, Board)

  • Lead with business impact, not technical detail
  • Use risk language: "This threat could result in..."
  • Include peer comparisons: "Organisations in our sector have seen..."
  • Recommend actions in business terms: "Investment in X reduces risk by..."
  • Maximum 1-2 pages
  • Visual aids (charts, traffic lights, risk matrices)

For Security Operations (SOC, IR)

  • Lead with actionable indicators
  • Include detection rules and hunt queries
  • Provide full TTP chain with ATT&CK mapping
  • Technical detail is expected and valued
  • Response playbook pointers
  • Real-time delivery for active threats

For Risk / Compliance

  • Lead with likelihood and impact assessments
  • Use standardised likelihood language (probability yardstick)
  • Map to frameworks (NIST CSF, ISO 27001)
  • Quantify where possible
  • Regulatory implications highlighted

Dissemination Matrix

TLP Distribution Channel Notes
RED Direct communication only (in-person, encrypted message) Named recipients only
AMBER+STRICT Internal secure channel (encrypted email, restricted SharePoint) Organisation only
AMBER Secure channel + need-to-know partners May share with clients/partners
GREEN Community channels (ISAC portal, closed mailing lists) Not public
CLEAR Any channel (blog, public advisories) Unrestricted

Feedback Collection

After every significant product delivery:

  1. Was the intelligence useful? (Yes/Partially/No)
  2. Was it timely? (Yes/Too late/Too early)
  3. Was the format appropriate? (Yes/Too technical/Too high-level)
  4. What should we cover next? (Free text)

Track feedback in stakeholder register. Feed into PIR refinement (see feedback-loops skill).