review-change
Review an exact diff, branch or pull request for actionable defects and acceptance gaps without editing files or running autofix. Use when the user asks to review, audit or check a change before mergi
Files9
View on GitHubSKILL.md.claude/skills/review-change/SKILL.md
GitHubreview-change
Steps
- Establish the base, exact revision/diff, acceptance, callers and relevant tests. Read only the architecture/profile relevant to the change. Review integrated backend/frontend contracts together.
- Inspect backend invariants, authorization/scopes, transactions, migrations, concurrency and effects.
- Inspect frontend private imports, server secrets vs client transport, stale queries after mutation or scope changes, form validation, error recovery, focus/accessibility and responsive behavior.
- Check API/BFF status codes, envelopes, headers/cookies and real consumer evidence.
- Use read-only searches/checks and focused reproductions on owned resources.
Output
One entry per finding: file/line, trigger, observable impact, evidence, and whether it is a reproduced failure or a hypothesis. A correct diff may have no findings. Return findings to backend-change/frontend-change/schema-change; the implementer refines and renews affected evidence, and validate-change resolves acceptance on the final combined state.
Gotchas
- Do not edit code or acceptance, run autofix, sync skills, publish, or claim another owner performed your review.
- Green lint is not complete semantic compliance.