task

Create a living task doc from natural language. Use when you want to track work, capture a new project, or create a thinking log that accumulates context across sessions.

SKILL.md

GitHub

/task - Create a living task doc

Create a task doc from natural language. A thinking log that accumulates context, decisions, and observations over time.


What to do

  1. Parse the request — understand what work is being described
  2. Check for duplicates — scan tasks/ for similar titles. If found, ask: "There's already '{similar task}' — is this the same thing or distinct?"
  3. Figure out metadata — topic, tags, priority
  4. Write the file — with the structure below
  5. Note the connection — this doc is what /wrap updates each session, including a SESSION INDEX line pointing at the captured session

Task doc structure

The block at the top is the handoff. A task doc that lives across sessions mixes the worklist with the record, and the current state ends up somewhere inside a long file. The NOW · DECIDED · OPEN block is the one place that stays current: rewrite it at the end of every session that touches the task (/wrap does this), never append to it, never prefix a line with "done." Everything below the line is the record, which accretes. If a doc grows a second "state as of today" block on top of the first, that's the failure. Drain into the one block; don't stack.

---
project: {project-name}     # when the task feeds a named project; also the filename prefix
# OR
area: {area-name}           # when there's no specific project (personal, system, tools)
tags:
  - {tag1}
  - {tag2}
priority: {P0|P1|P2|P3}
status: todo
created_date: {YYYY-MM-DD}
---

# {Title}

> ## ▶ NOW · DECIDED · OPEN — rewritten each session, never appended to
>
> **NOW (next session, in order):** {what to do first — five lines at most}
>
> **DECIDED (don't relitigate):** {calls already made}
>
> **OPEN (the human's calls):** {what's still theirs to decide}
>
> *Everything below this line is record.*

## WHAT

{Description — why this matters, context, what triggered this}

---

## WHO

{People involved — names, roles, current status}

---

## HOW

### Pending (Execute Next)
- [ ] {First action item}

### Completed (Append in order of completion)
<!-- Move items here when done, newest at bottom -->

---

## LINKS

<!-- Related files, docs, other tasks -->

---

## OBSERVATIONS (Cumulative)

*Patterns, friction, questions worth keeping, from you or the AI*

<!-- Add observations as they emerge across sessions -->

---

## SESSION INDEX

<!-- Pointers to captured sessions related to this work -->
<!-- Format: **Session N (YYYY-MM-DD)**: [filename] — one-liner of what happened -->

---

Why this structure

Most task trackers give you a title and a checkbox. This gives you a thinking log.

  • NOW · DECIDED · OPEN is where you land when you come back — current state in five lines, without reading the whole history
  • WHAT holds the why, which keeps you oriented when you pick this up days later
  • HOW splits pending from completed so you always know where you left off
  • OBSERVATIONS is where the real value accumulates: patterns you noticed, friction you hit, questions that emerged
  • SESSION INDEX links to your captured sessions so you can trace how the thinking evolved

When a task is done

Archive completed tasks to tasks/_done/ to preserve the thinking. The task doc is a record of how you got somewhere — decisions, dead ends, observations. That's worth keeping even after the work is finished. /wrap handles this when you mark a task done.


Example

Input: /task research markdown editors - want to find something that works on mobile and desktop for editing my system on the go

AI figures out:

  • area: tools (no named project → area:, and it becomes the filename prefix)
  • tags: research, mobile
  • priority: P2 (no urgency indicated)
  • WHAT captures the why (mobile + desktop editing), not just the task

Creates: tasks/tools - research markdown editors.md. Every task doc takes the {area or project} - {description}.md shape, so a plain ls tasks/ groups tasks by what the work feeds.


Skill Check (after every task creation)

Quick scan: anything about this task creation that felt off or could be smoother?

  • Was the WHAT section clear enough for future you?
  • Did the structure feel right for this type of work?
  • Was anything missing that you'd want next time you pick this up?

If yes → update this skill now. The improvement compounds.

If no → move on. Not every task teaches something.