security_hardening
Maintains the ansible/roles/security_hardening Ansible role that verifies Secure Boot/FIPS state, sets kernel lockdown mode, SELinux mode, the system crypto policy, and SCP protocol availability, as p
Files1
View on GitHubSKILL.md.claude/skills/security_hardening/SKILL.md
GitHubsecurity_hardening
Maintains ansible/roles/security_hardening/. See docs/ARCHITECTURE.md for the shared
conventions (role layout, audit vs. remediate via --check --diff, safety
rules, branch + PR contribution workflow).
ansible/roles/security_hardening/README.md documents this role's full
configuration surface (every defaults/main.yml variable, with its
original inline comments, rendered as a single reference). Read it
before proposing or explaining how to configure this role — it
reflects the role's actual current defaults even if a variable summary
elsewhere in this file has drifted out of sync with the role.
Policy & workload awareness
docs/VERTICAL_POLICY.md, docs/HORIZONTAL_POLICY and docs/WORKLOAD.md capture org-wide policy items and
the workloads this SOE actually hosts — either can gain a new or changed
item that this role should reflect. Before auditing, remediating, or
proposing a change, check whether either doc has changed more recently
than this role's own code:
git log -1 --format='%cI %h %s' -- docs/VERTICAL_POLICY.md docs/HORIZONTAL_POLICY.md docs/WORKLOAD.md
git log -1 --format='%cI %h %s' -- ansible/roles/security_hardening/
If the docs' latest commit is newer than the role's, this role hasn't been re-assessed against current policy/workload — read both files and judge whether anything added or changed since is relevant to this domain:
- Relevant — propose a concrete change on a branch
(
soe/security_hardening/policy-<short-desc>orsoe/security_hardening/workload-<short-desc>), same branch + PR workflow as any other role change (see "What to do" above anddocs/ARCHITECTURE.md's "Contribution workflow"). Don't wait to be asked. - Not relevant — say so explicitly (e.g. "checked against
docs/VERTICAL_POLICY.md,docs/HORIZONTAL_POLICYanddocs/WORKLOAD.mdas of<date>, nothing affecting this domain") rather than silently skipping the check.
This check is informational, not a gate — it runs alongside a normal audit/remediate, never blocks one; surface the staleness note alongside the normal output.
What the role actually does
Encoded in ansible/roles/security_hardening/defaults/main.yml:
secure_boot_verify/fips_mode_verify(both defaultfalse) are audit-only checks — when enabled, the role fails the run if Secure Boot or FIPS isn't actually enabled on the host (viamokutil --sb-stateand/proc/sys/crypto/fips_enabled/CPU AES flag respectively); it does not attempt to turn either on.kernel_lockdown(defaultdisabled; RHEL 9+ only) — the role's own note: enabling lockdown (integrity/confidentiality) prevents using kdump.selinux(defaultenforcing) andcrypto_policy(defaultDEFAULT) are applied directly.scp_protocol_enable(defaulttrue) toggles the (legacy)scpprotocol, distinct from thescp(1)command itself per the role's own default comment.
This role is sourced from the myllynen/rhel-ansible-roles import
(see git log -- ansible/roles/security_hardening) rather than hand-authored for this
repo. Unlike the original reference domains (e.g. timesync, usbguard_setup),
it applies state declaratively via standard Ansible modules and does not
add its own assert-based drift checks on top — an audit here is exactly
what --check --diff reports from the underlying modules, nothing more.
What to do
Audit (read-only, safe to run any time):
ansible-playbook ansible/configure_rhel.yml --tags security_hardening --check --diff
Summarize the diff output and any failed tasks in plain language.
Remediate (modifies the system — only after the user explicitly asks):
first summarize what will change from the --check --diff output, then run
the same command without --check:
ansible-playbook ansible/configure_rhel.yml --tags security_hardening
Propose a change to the role itself: never edit and commit directly. On a
branch named soe/security_hardening/<short-desc>, edit ansible/roles/security_hardening/, validate
locally (--syntax-check, ansible-lint roles/security_hardening/, and
--check --diff against a real/test host if available), then push and open a
PR titled [security_hardening] <what changed> with the --check --diff output in the
body. Then stop — a human reviews and merges; see docs/ARCHITECTURE.md's
"Contribution workflow".
Notes
fips_mode_verify: truefailing does not mean this role can fix it — FIPS mode is generally an install-time decision on RHEL; treat a failure here as a finding to report, not something to auto-remediate. Changingkernel_lockdownorcrypto_policycan affect boot behavior and what crypto/kdump features work — treat proposed changes here with the same care asboot_parameters.
Wiring into the SOE
This role is in configure_rhel_domains's default value in
ansible/configure_rhel.yml (see .claude/skills/configure_rhel/SKILL.md)
and has a row in .claude/skills/soe/SKILL.md's domain table, so it runs as
part of both ansible-playbook ansible/configure_rhel.yml --tags security_hardening ... and
a full, untagged ansible-playbook ansible/configure_rhel.yml run. This repo
no longer uses ansible/site.yml as the baseline entrypoint — see
docs/ARCHITECTURE.md.