stage1-neurips-breakdown
Break down full NeurIPS reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains NeurIPS reviewer fields (Summary, Strengths and Weaknesses, Questions, Limitations) and numeric score
SKILL.mdskills/stage1/neurips/SKILL.md
GitHubStage 1 · NeurIPS Breakdown Skill (Template Extension)
Apply the shared template first:
skills/stage1/template/SKILL.md
Then apply only the NeurIPS-specific overrides below.
NeurIPS overrides
Score mapping (required keys)
Extract exactly these six keys (numbers only):
rating<- NeurIPSRating/Overallconfidence<- NeurIPSConfidencequality<- NeurIPSQualityclarity<- NeurIPSClaritysignificance<- NeurIPSSignificanceoriginality<- NeurIPSOriginality
Scores may appear as 3: good or 5: Accept — extract the leading number only.
Preserved section mapping
summary<-Summarystrength<-Strengths And Weaknesses
Atomic issue source mapping
- weakness-type source <-
Questions(label asweakness) - question-type source <-
Limitations(label asquestion)
Output header and score block
- Header must be exactly:
# Stage1 NeurIPS Breakdown ## Scoresmust contain exactly the six keys above.
NeurIPS notes
- The
Limitationsfield sometimes contains a standard phrase ("The authors thoroughly discussed the limitations of their work.") — preserve it verbatim rather than splitting into atomic issues if it is a single affirmative statement. - Score values may include descriptive labels after the colon (e.g.
4: excellent) — extract only the numeric portion.