web-research-corpus-singlepass
Ablation variant of web-research-corpus with the iterative Search->Assess->Decide reflection loop and its strict completion criteria removed (GATE 1 OFF — no local reflection). The agent performs a si
Files1
View on GitHubSKILL.mdarcticswarm/skills/web-research-corpus-singlepass/SKILL.md
GitHubCorpus Research Skill
Mission
Search the document corpus thoroughly to gather reliable, factual, and verifiable information that directly addresses the question. Document everything — facts, uncertainties, alternative interpretations, and conflicting information.
Corpus Research Guidance
For research questions that require finding information in the document corpus, search thoroughly and cross-verify from multiple sources.
- Use
web_searchto find relevant text chunks from the corpus. - Use
web_fetchwith a descriptive query to retrieve the full document text when you need more context than search snippets provide. The query should describe what you want to read — it is NOT URL-based. - Start with broad queries, then narrow down based on initial results.
- Cross-check key facts across at least 2 independent document chunks.
- If sources conflict, note the discrepancy and explain which you trust more and why.
Core Principles
- Comprehensive Coverage: All aspects of the question must be addressed from multiple perspectives (mainstream + alternative viewpoints).
- Depth Over Breadth: Reject superficial data; require detailed data points and multi-source verification.
- Information Redundancy: Pursue information redundancy — avoid "minimum sufficient" data. When accuracy matters, more data is always better than less.
Source Quality Scores (Optional)
When you call web_search, the system may or may not automatically score
each result for relevance, answerability, authority, and data_density (each 0-10).
You may see a [Source Quality: ...] annotation on results. If provided:
- High composite (25+/40): Reliable primary evidence. Cite these.
- Medium composite (15-24/40): Supporting evidence. Cross-reference.
- Low composite (<15/40): Weak source. Search for better alternatives.
Source Evaluation
Critically evaluate the trustworthiness of every piece of information you retrieve:
- If a source's reliability is uncertain, explicitly flag it.
- Do not assume information is credible merely because it appears in the corpus — cross-verify when appropriate.
- When sources conflict or the information is ambiguous, report all relevant findings and clearly indicate the inconsistency.
- Favor quoting or excerpting the original source text rather than paraphrasing or interpreting it.
Calculator Usage
- NEVER calculate mentally — use the
calculatortool for ALL numeric operations including arithmetic, percentages, counting, rounding, and unit conversions. - For counting items: list items explicitly with numbering, then use
calculatorto verify the total. - For rounding: use
ceil()for "round up",floor()for "round down",round()for standard rounding.
Research Rigor
- Cross-verify claims — compare statements from multiple sources to identify commonalities and deviations. Highlight any discrepancies.
- For lists/enumeration — if the question asks "all X that meet Y", search multiple sources and explicitly verify completeness.
- For superlatives ("oldest", "newest", "first", "last") — verify with multiple different search queries. Don't accept first result as definitive.
- Terminology precision — use the MOST COMMON EVERYDAY term. Copy names and terms EXACTLY from sources with all qualifiers.
- Be decisive — present findings confidently if sources are credible. Only say "unable to determine" after exhaustive search finds nothing.
- Resist fame bias — questions are designed so that the obvious/famous answer is usually WRONG. If your initial research points to a very well-known entity, invest extra effort searching for obscure alternatives that match ALL constraints. The correct answer is typically someone/something that requires deep searching to find.
Search Diversity
When initial searches return poor results or fail to find the answer, systematically broaden your search angles:
- Vary terminology — Try synonyms, alternative spellings, and related terms for the same concept.
- Try partial queries — Break a complex question into smaller, more focused queries targeting individual facts.
- Use non-English keywords — If the subject may have a native-language name, search using that name (romanized or original script) alongside English terms.
- Use web_fetch for deeper reads — When search snippets are
insufficient, use
web_fetchwith a targeted query to retrieve the full document text for deeper investigation.