vulnerability-prioritization

Analyzes CVE reports and vulnerability scan results against your deployed infrastructure to determine actual exploitability and business impact. Correlates vulnerabilities with running services, netwo

SKILL.md

GitHub

Vulnerability Prioritization

Analyze CVE reports against your deployed infrastructure and generate a prioritized patching plan.

Integrations: GitHub, Jira

When to Use

  • The user has vulnerability scan results (e.g., Nessus, Trivy, Snyk) and needs to prioritize which CVEs to patch first
  • A security or compliance audit requires evidence of risk-based patching decisions
  • The user mentions "CVE prioritization", "vulnerability triage", "patching plan", or "too many CVEs to patch"
  • Teams need Jira tickets or task tracking for remediation work

Steps

Step 1: Ingest Vulnerability Data

Collect and normalize vulnerability inputs:

Source Format Key Fields to Extract
Nessus / Qualys export XML, CSV CVE ID, severity, affected package/version, host/IP
Snyk / Dependabot JSON, API CVE ID, package, version, fix version, direct vs transitive
Trivy / Grype JSON CVE ID, severity, package, installed version
Manual CVE list CSV, list CVE ID, severity, description

Ask the user for: scan export or CVE list, scan date, and scope (which environments, which asset groups).

Use GitHub MCP to cross-reference CVE data with repository dependencies (package.json, requirements.txt, go.mod, etc.).

Step 2: Map to Deployed Infrastructure

Correlate vulnerabilities with actual running services:

Infrastructure Data Source Use
Service inventory Confluence, docs, deployment manifests Which services run which components
Dependency trees package.json, Pipfile, go.mod Which packages (and versions) are in use
Network exposure Load balancers, ingress, firewall rules Public vs internal vs no network
Data sensitivity Data classification, compliance scope PHI, PII, financial data handling
Deployment topology K8s manifests, Terraform, CloudFormation Which nodes/pods run which workloads

Use GitHub MCP to read deployment configs, Dockerfiles, and dependency files. Map each vulnerable component to specific deployed services and their exposure level.

Step 3: Assess Exploitability and Impact

Score each CVE for actual risk in the user's environment:

Factor High Risk Medium Risk Low Risk
Network exposure Public internet, DMZ Internal only No network, air-gapped
Data sensitivity PHI, PII, payment data Internal business data Non-sensitive
Active exploits Known exploit in wild PoC available No known exploit
Ease of exploitation Remote, no auth Local or auth required Complex chain
Compensating controls None WAF, IDS Full isolation, no access

Combine with CVSS/base severity to produce a final Effective Severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low) and SLA category.

Step 4: Generate Prioritized Patching Plan

Create a risk-ranked plan with SLA windows:

SLA Tier Severity Patch Window Example
P0 Critical + exploitable 7 days Public-facing auth service
P1 High + exposed 30 days Internal services with sensitive data
P2 Medium or low exposure 60–90 days Internal-only, non-sensitive
P3 Deferred Next quarter Not in dependency tree, or compensating controls

For each prioritized CVE, document:

  1. CVE ID and affected package/version
  2. Affected services (names, repos, deployment paths)
  3. Remediation — Upgrade path, workaround, or accept risk with justification
  4. SLA deadline based on tier

Step 5: Create Tracking Tickets

Use Jira MCP to create tickets:

Field Value
Project User's security/project key
Issue type Task or Story
Summary e.g., "Patch CVE-2026-1234 in payment-api (Critical)"
Description CVE details, affected service, remediation steps, SLA
Labels CVE, severity, service name
Priority Map P0→Highest, P1→High, etc.
Due date SLA deadline

Link tickets to parent epic or initiative if the user has one. Optionally add sub-tasks for each affected service.

Output

Deliver:

  • Prioritized patching plan table with CVE, severity, affected services, exposure, and SLA
  • List of deferred CVEs with rationale (not in use, not exploitable, compensating controls)
  • Jira tickets for each prioritized CVE with remediation details and due dates
  • Executive summary (total CVEs, exploitable count, critical/high SLA counts)
  • Optional: Remediation playbook with upgrade commands or workaround steps per package