testing Skills

Use when reviewing code, handling review feedback, or posting a review to a GitHub PR — 14-dimension quality analysis fo...

Review spec-forge generated documents (tech-design + feature specs) for quality, completeness, and internal consistency....

Review code quality, security, and maintainability before committing. Use when reviewing code changes, checking code qua...

../../../engineering-team/playwright-pro/skills/review/SKILL.md

Perform a code review on recent changes

Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis

Review the current diff for correctness, security, and convention drift before shipping. Use after finishing a unit of w...

コードレビューを実施。プルリクエストのレビュー、コード品質チェック、改善提案の際に使用。

Multi-agent review with lesson-calibrated reviewers, runtime verification, and severity classification

Build an evidence matrix for clinical, mechanistic, or bioinformatics review synthesis. Use after deep reading to map cl...

Final personal quality-control audit for medical SCI reviews and translational manuscripts. Use before submission, major...

Use when evaluating whether a skill belongs in a library. Preview content, check frontmatter, validate structure, and de...

Accessibility audit. Dispatches an accessibility auditor to identify WCAG conformance gaps, prioritize by user impact, a...

Use this skill when reviewing code to ensure features are agent-native - that any action a user can take, an agent can a...

Detect agentic coding infrastructure in a project: CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, installed skills, MCP servers, hooks, and cross...

Guidance on combining findings from multiple review agents into actionable recommendations

Scan for AHK v1 patterns that slipped into the v2 codebase

Review changes made by AI editors (Codex, Claude, etc.). Run git diff, lint, security scan, tests, and provide a code re...

Detect AI-generated writing patterns in developer text — docs, docstrings, commit messages, PR descriptions, and code co...

Use when the user asks to review the uncommitted changes and then commit them — the verdict gates the commit. Not for a...

Reviews outputs as a hackathon judge and ensures compliance with specs and rules.

Judge flagged trace outputs and promote judged items back to datasets. Use when an evaluation run requires human judgmen...

Review and refactor code in your project according to defined instructions

Check API, library, and framework usage in code against official documentation and installed skill knowledge. Flags depr...

[Code Quality] Review artifact quality before handoff. Use to verify PBIs, designs, stories meet quality standards.

Use when the user already has a solution, plan, approach, or design and wants to know how well it aligns with best pract...

Use when evaluating whether a SKILL.md meets STANDARD.md criteria — for PR review of official grimoire-core contribution...

Discover functions that block the main thread, then micro-audit each for internal optimization opportunities

Review the current branch against its base branch: lint, tests, architecture and Angular 22 conventions, reported by sev...

A skill for reviewing git branches. It helps analyze changes, commit history, and provide feedback to ensure code qualit...

Review code changes with Bugbot subagent.

Review an open change thoroughly and against something outside the change itself: assess what work categories the diff c...

Review an exact diff, branch or pull request for actionable defects and acceptance gaps without editing files or running...

Review uncommitted code changes for bugs, security issues, and style violations.

[Code Quality] Review all uncommitted changes before commit

End-to-end review pipeline — creates a handoff, generates a review (self-review or paste-ready for another provider), th...

Review a pull request, diff, patch or branch against a fixed checklist (correctness, tests, error handling, security, pe...

Audit all CLAUDE.md files for dead references, bloat, and inconsistencies

Analyze code quality based on "Clean Code" principles. Identify naming, function size, duplication, over-engineering, an...

Provides a structured workflow for planning and executing code reviews like a senior engineer. Use when asked to review...

Run a comprehensive multi-perspective code review on current changes. Activates the Review Council (security, quality, d...

Review code for quality, correctness, and fit. Use when the user wants judgment on code that already exists — their own...

Perform a senior-engineer code review when the user asks to review code, review a PR, review changes, or check code qual...

Review code changes following HMIS project standards. Use when reviewing a pull request, verifying code changes, or chec...

(ePost) Ultrathink edge cases, then parallel verify with reviewers

自分が書いた差分を、そのリポジトリの規約と設計の境界に照らしてレビューし、must / imo / nits の3段階で会話へ返す。GitHub へは投稿しない。ユーザーが「レビューして」「軽く見て」「セルフレビューして」「/review-...

Perform a comprehensive code review of either the current branch or a specific GitHub pull request.

Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage ga...